As all proud North Dakotans should be aware, our state is the only region in the United States that prefers Pepsi to Coke in overall sales. The new Capitol Cafe’s choice of beverage providers can only be an inside deal struck against the sensibilities of the average Ole.
The new leader of National Public Radio, who used to work for Minnesota Public Radio’s Southern California division, has already caused a shakeup by firing a digital-side writer, as NPR seems to be coming down from a period of website extras and online-only specials.
Rodger Wetzel is no longer the director of AARP North Dakota. I don’t much care for the idea of being fired for one’s opinions, but lying to the public while appearing in a campaign for a controversial constitutional amendment probably justifies dismissal from a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, whose tax status, let alone the public trust, depends on impartiality.
I have a problem with the Measure 1 committee painting the picture using Wetzel’s office and associating an impartial group with their views. The AARP is, among other things, the primary sponsor of the election debates on Prairie Public, not exactly a role that ought to be played by an organization that plays favourites.
Wetzel is lying to the elderly about what Measure 1 takes off the table, when he says Measure 1 will have no impact on end-of-life issues. For one thing, Measure 1 would make do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders illegal. Under Measure 1, hospitals would be unable to “pull the plug” on anyone, even if they were in constant pain and screaming (or issuing muffled complaints from under the ventilator). You would have the court-ordered inalienable “right” to suffer through every treatment modern medicine has to offer, despite your protests, until your body finally gives up anyway.
So yeah, I’m voting NO on Measure 1.
Measure 5, the only referred measure worth voting for this year, is set for a victory. I find it encouraging that North Dakotans see the value in setting aside a small fraction of oil revenue to clean up after an industry that continues to deflect and subcontract the blame when it comes to pollution.
In South Dakota, as in Kansas, a popular independent candidate may thwart the GOP’s chances of flipping the Senate.
Larry Pressler’s moderate stances and name recognition is making for a serious challenge to what was previously thought to be a lock. The DSCC even likes the poll numbers so much, it’s backing Rick Weiland’s once-quixotic Democratic candidacy. Way to go!
Election Day, October 22nd, is fast approaching in Winnipeg. Seven candidates vie for the prize, including Robert-Falcon Ouellette, who won j5mc’s take on the Winnipeg Free Press candidate matcher. The race has been particularly dogged by partisanship, or allegations thereof, between the NDP’s Judy Wasylycia-Leis and the PC’s Brian Bowman. Polls indicate that Judy is the favourite to win, with the closest challenger needing to capture the whole of a 10-point pivot.
Advance polls have been open since the 29th, so it should be easier for voters to cast their ballots when they’ve found their match. Here’s hoping for a good turnout and good public policy!
There’s nothing that says “I have lots of money and no good ideas” quite like a plot of empty land. No housing, no farming, not so much as a sidewalk or park bench adorns this lonely stretch of 42nd Street near the Alerus Centre.
There are three signs on this land. One says it’s for sale.
In the next sign, the petty fief behind this ostentatious display would have us know that they feel they should have an immutable right to tax-free real estate transactions, the bogus logic of Measure 2.
Finally, we’re treated to a sign advertising a party slate of legislative candidates. Which, when standing in an empty field, can only be read as: backers of nothing, backed by nothing.
Then there’s this other lot, located way outside of District 43, mind you, that’s right where a downtown office tower ought to sit. After being an eyesore for years, it has been improved to “unkempt hedge” status…
Better watch out — there are legal opinions floating around saying that North Dakota can’t issue you your tax refund anymore. It’s been thrown out with the bathwater now that the idea of cutting an oil rebate check to all North Dakotans is on the agenda.
Whose legal opinion are we talking about here? Certainly not the opinions of our constitution’s drafters, or the Supreme Court, or even the Attorney General — in this case the Forum News Service provides us with the opinion of John Walstad of the North Dakota Legislative Council — someone whose opinion of the law greatly influences what does and does not get drafted into a bill.
“The state’s money is to be used for state purposes and not for donations for some private purpose, no matter how worthwhile it might be,”
It sure sounds like tax refunds, tax credits, school scholarships, loan guarantees, and any number of public-private partnerships –all things that that State of North Dakota does– would be banned by that interpretation of the language. The Bank of North Dakota, whose existence was actively challenged at inception, was never declared unconstitutional…. so what gives?
Then there’s another question: On what basis does John Walstad allow himself to talk to the media this week? Because the last time I asked the Legislative Council a question, they quoted me their exception to the State’s Open Records Law. So the Legislative Council gets to pick and choose what it deems to be the public interest — and in this case, it’s “you can’t get a rebate check for oil.”
I think from recent events it’s pretty clear that no one should be voting for Ryan Rauschenberger. And I think that a news agency that portends itself as the paper of record for the region that runs a free ad for Rauschenberger on its front page is at best violating ethics, decorum, and public decency, if not the law.
What makes the Grand Forks Herald treat a Republican bake sale as a news event, when several League candidates have held quaint fundraisers of their own over the last month or so, but with no cameras from the Herald?
If you are a pie-eating Republican that can’t bring yourself to vote for Jason Astrup, then at least vote for Libertarian candidate Anthony Mangnall. If you don’t vote in protest — if you yellow-dog and fill in the circle next to the name Ryan Rauschenberger, you are saying you are willing to put up with literally anyone the Republican Party bosses spackle onto your ballot. You are saying that there is no accountability in the state of North Dakota. There definitely isn’t at the Herald.
Of the current statewide officeholders [all Republican], perhaps only Wayne Stenehjem and Kelly Schmidt were actually elected by the people to begin with. Everyone else owes their incumbency to those original appointments.